social well-being

Promote positive interaction and collaboration between students

There are many ways to promote positive interaction and collaboration between students. Several of these were bought up by teachers and students in the questionnaires. It is, for instance important to involve students in creating rules of conduct for the school, and conversations about the meaning of these rules. In several respects it has been shown important to implement core elements of dialogic education as a part of the learning process and to use teaching exercises in which each student is provided opportunity to make a unique contribution to the whole. Another aspect is to promote positive social peer role models. Safe environments for interaction with peers is important and related to this is also the wish from students and teachers to create opportunities, during schoolwork and breaks, to interact with students from other classes. Overall, it is found important to create routines for practicing pro-social skills and abilities – such as listening skills, empathy, understanding, social adaption, and how to initiate play or conversation with others.

 

If you want to know more:

  • Asterhan, C. S. C., Howe, C., Lefstein, A., Matusov, E., & Reznitskaya, A. (2020). Controversies and consensus in research on dialogic teaching and learning. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 8. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2020.312
  • Gover, A., Loukkola, T., & Peterbauer, H. (2019). Student-centred learning: Approaches to quality assurance (pp. 1–22). European University Association.
  • Reznitskaya, A., Glina, M., Carolan, B., Michaud, O., Rogers, J., & Sequeira, L. (2012). Examining transfer effects from dialogic discussions to new tasks and contexts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37(4), 288–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.02.003
  • Todorovski, B., Nordal, E., Isoski, T., Camilleri, A., Välimma, J., Szabo, M., Nastase, P., & Nokkala, T. (2015). Overview on Student-centered learning in higher education in Europe: Research study (pp. 1–47). European Students’ Union ESU.

Besides student-student interaction, there are several aspects of teacher-student interaction that are important for students’ well-being and learning in school. For instance, it has been found important to identify students’ strengths and show the students that you appreciate these. As a teacher, it is relevant to encourage students’ commitment and effort, be a bit personal and also use humor during class or before starting a class (without making fun of students). Moreover, the students found it important that the teachers are clear to the students about that the teachers care for them beyond their academic grades. It was also brought up that the teachers should encourage that students express social concerns to the teacher which are then to be handled with care. In prior research, it has been shown important that the teachers involve the students in meta-cognition about their learning process so that they are part of setting goals, discussing learning strategies and participating in evaluation their strategies and goals, which was also brought up in the questionnaire data.

 

If you want to know more:

  • Burgh, G. (2021). The Narrow-sense and Wide-sense Community of Inquiry: What It Means for Teachers. Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis, 41(1).
  • Gardelli, V. (2022). Philosophy for/with Children, Teacher Training and Value Transmission. In A. Kizel, Philosophy with Children and Teacher Education (1st ed., pp. 14–22). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003212737-4
  • Holmgren, A.-C., Backman, Y., Gardelli, V., & Gyllefjord, Å. (2023). On Being Twice Exceptional in Sweden—An Interview-Based Case Study about the Educational Situation for a Gifted Student Diagnosed with ADHD. Education Sciences, 13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111120
  • Kizel, A. (2022). Philosophy with Children and Teacher Education: Global Perspectives on Critical, Creative and Caring Thinking (1st ed.). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003212737
  • Schaffalitzky, C. (2021). Learning to facilitate dialogue: On challenges and teachers’ assessments of their own performance. Educational Studies, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2021.2007854

The means for providing organisational prerequisites to support development of social well-being that were brought up in the data are also means for creating organisational prerequisites for supporting well-being in general. To do this, it is essential to create opportunities for school staff to discuss common well-being goals, establish routines to involve the whole school in the (pro-social) well-being work, and establish routines to follow-up on chosen well-being goals and methods applied to reach the goals.

 

If you want to know more:

  • Cavanagh, M., McDowell, C., Connor Bones, U. O, Taggart, L. & Mulhall, P. (2024). The theoretical and evidence-based components of whole school approaches: An international scoping review. Review of Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3485
  • Higgins, E. & Booker, R. (2022). The implementation of a whole school approach to mental health and well-being promotion in the Irish primary school context, Health Education Journal, 81(6), 649–666. tps://doi.org/10.1177/00178969221105319  

There are several different definitions of inclusive education, and here we just settle with suggesting a few strategies that support a good social atmosphere for all students in school. Among such strategies it is important to differentiate teaching methods and content to suit different needs and knowledge levels. The students and teachers found it important to be involved in conversations about solidarity and kindness, and in practices aimed at helping fellow students. It is also important to develop and evaluate social and teaching strategies for involving students at risk of being marginalised.

 

If you want to know more:

  • Edström, K., Gardelli, V., & Backman, Y. (2022). Inclusion as participation: Mapping the participation model with four different levels of inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2022.2136773
  • Haug, P. 2017. “Understanding Inclusive Education: Ideals and Reality.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 19(3): 206–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2016.1224778
  • Nilholm, C. 2021. “Research about Inclusive Education in 2020 – How Can We Improve Our Theories in Order to Change Practice?” European Journal of Special Needs Education 36(3): 358–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2020.1754547
  • Nilholm, C., and B. Alm. 2010. “An Inclusive Classroom? A Case Study of Inclusiveness, Teacher Strategies, and Children’s Experiences.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 25(3): 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2010.492933 
Salta al contenuto